Workflow Eval Detail

Chapters

Automatically segments long-form video content into navigable chapters with timestamps and titles—enabling viewers to jump to key moments instantly.

Latest Runcompleted
muxinc/ai
maind8d0122·@mux/ai v0.53.0
Cases
32
Avg Score
0.97
Avg Latency
5.67s
Avg Cost
$0.0052
Avg Cost / Min
$0.0006/min
Avg Tokens
4,329
TL;DR

Chapters performed strongly overall; use `gemini-3.1-flash-lite` for the best combined quality and latency, or `gpt-5.6-luna` to minimize cost.

Best Quality
google
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
Fastest
google
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
Most Economical
openai
gpt-5.6-luna

What we measure

Each eval run captures efficacy, efficiency, and expense. We use this data to compare providers and track regressions over time.

Efficacy
Quality + correctness
Efficiency
Latency + token usage
Expense
Cost per request

Workflow snapshot

Suite statussuccess
Suite average score0.96
Suite duration1 minute 15 seconds
Last suite runOct 16, 09:36 PM

Evaluation criteria

From eval tests

We evaluate chapter segmentation quality, timestamp accuracy, and title relevance alongside latency and cost metrics.

0:0020:00
Segmenting
↓
AI Chapters6 segments
1
Introduction & Welcome
0:00
2
Setting Up Your Environment
2:22
3
Core Concepts Deep Dive
6:25
4
Building the First Feature
10:12
5
Testing & Debugging
14:51
6
Deployment & Next Steps
18:44
Language: en
●Processing...
Temporal Segmentation
Efficacy checks
  • Chapter titles are non-empty and descriptive.
  • Start times are valid and monotonically increasing.
  • Chapter count is reasonable for video duration.
  • Language code matches expected ISO 639-1 format.
  • Semantic coherence between chapter titles and content.
Efficiency targets
  • Latency: scores are normalized between 0 and 1. Under 10s earns 1.0; past 25s trends toward 0.
  • Token usage: scores are normalized between 0 and 1. Under 5,000 tokens earns 1.0; higher usage reduces the score.
Expense guardrails
  • Estimated cost under $0.015 per request for full score.
  • Usage data must include total tokens for cost analysis.

Provider breakdown

Run d8d0122
Efficacy scoreHigher is better
LatencyLower is better
Token UsageLower is better
CostLower is better
ProviderModelCasesAvg ScoreAvg LatencyAvg TokensAvg CostAvg Cost / Min
anthropicclaude-sonnet-4-550.993.8s3,847$0.0132$0.0015/min
googlegemini-2.5-flash50.987.53s5,189$0.0047$0.0005/min
googlegemini-3-flash-preview50.958.8s5,625$0.0078$0.0007/min
googlegemini-3.1-flash-lite50.991.31s3,803$0.0012$0.0001/min
openaigpt-5-mini50.9410.62s4,510$0.003$0.0003/min
openaigpt-5.140.982.39s3,363$0.0037$0.0006/min
openaigpt-5.6-luna30.983.84s3,399$0.0003$0.00/min

Recent cases

Latest run · 32 cases
anthropic ·claude-sonnet-4-5Oct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.97
Latency
3.98s
Cost
$0.0133
anthropic ·claude-sonnet-4-5Oct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.97
Latency
2.39s
Cost
$0.012
anthropic ·claude-sonnet-4-5Oct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
1
Latency
3.96s
Cost
$0.0134
anthropic ·claude-sonnet-4-5Oct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
1
Latency
4.37s
Cost
$0.0135
anthropic ·claude-sonnet-4-5Oct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
1
Latency
4.3s
Cost
$0.0139
google ·gemini-2.5-flashOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.96
Latency
6.25s
Cost
$0.0042
google ·gemini-2.5-flashOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.95
Latency
8.23s
Cost
$0.0051
google ·gemini-2.5-flashOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.99
Latency
7.43s
Cost
$0.0051
google ·gemini-2.5-flashOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.98
Latency
8.54s
Cost
$0.005
google ·gemini-2.5-flashOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
1
Latency
7.24s
Cost
$0.0041
google ·gemini-3-flash-previewOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.96
Latency
5.71s
Cost
$0.0057
google ·gemini-3-flash-previewOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.95
Latency
7.68s
Cost
$0.0069
google ·gemini-3-flash-previewOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
1
Latency
4.61s
Cost
$0.0047
google ·gemini-3-flash-previewOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.91
Latency
12.62s
Cost
$0.0108
google ·gemini-3-flash-previewOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.91
Latency
13.39s
Cost
$0.0111
google ·gemini-3.1-flash-liteOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.97
Latency
1.18s
Cost
$0.0012
google ·gemini-3.1-flash-liteOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.97
Latency
1.15s
Cost
$0.001
google ·gemini-3.1-flash-liteOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
1
Latency
1.52s
Cost
$0.0013
google ·gemini-3.1-flash-liteOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
1
Latency
1.32s
Cost
$0.0013
google ·gemini-3.1-flash-liteOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
1
Latency
1.37s
Cost
$0.0012
openai ·gpt-5-miniOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.84
Latency
9.65s
Cost
$0.0033
openai ·gpt-5-miniOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.96
Latency
7.8s
Cost
$0.0026
openai ·gpt-5-miniOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.98
Latency
10.52s
Cost
$0.0026
openai ·gpt-5-miniOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.97
Latency
12.21s
Cost
$0.0033
openai ·gpt-5-miniOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.97
Latency
12.91s
Cost
$0.003
openai ·gpt-5.1Oct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.95
Latency
3.09s
Cost
$0.0056
openai ·gpt-5.1Oct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.97
Latency
2.75s
Cost
$0.0047
openai ·gpt-5.1Oct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
1
Latency
1.73s
Cost
$0.002
openai ·gpt-5.1Oct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
1
Latency
2.01s
Cost
$0.0024
openai ·gpt-5.6-lunaOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.97
Latency
3.73s
Cost
$0.0003
openai ·gpt-5.6-lunaOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
0.97
Latency
4.58s
Cost
$0.0002
openai ·gpt-5.6-lunaOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 1XIUcA9
Score
1
Latency
3.23s
Cost
$0.0003