Workflow Eval Detail

Ask Questions

Answers natural-language questions about a video by retrieving relevant context and answering with a concise response.

Latest Runcompleted
muxinc/ai
main91c5674·@mux/ai v0.26.0
Cases
6
Avg Score
0.95
Avg Latency
5.89s
Avg Cost
$0.004
Avg Cost / Min
$0.0071/min
Avg Tokens
3,746
TL;DR

Ask Questions workflow shows very high quality and low cost across providers, with Google flash models leading on accuracy and efficiency, but results are based on only 6 cases.

Best Quality
google
gemini-2.5-flash
Fastest
google
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
Most Economical
google
gemini-3.1-flash-lite

What we measure

Each eval run captures efficacy, efficiency, and expense. We use this data to compare providers and track regressions over time.

Efficacy
Quality + correctness
Efficiency
Latency + token usage
Expense
Cost per request

Workflow snapshot

Suite statussuccess
Suite average score0.95
Suite duration35.32s
Last suite runJul 6, 07:17 PM

Evaluation criteria

From eval tests

We score answer accuracy and response integrity while tracking latency, token usage, and cost.

Question set3 checks
Question
Has on-screen text?
Answer: YesConf0.94
Question
Is the speaker visible?
Answer: NoConf0.88
Question
Scene indoors?
Answer: YesConf0.91
Accuracy
Match expected yes/no outputs.
Format
Required fields + response shape.
Integrity
Confidence and reasoning present.
Throughput
Latency and cost stay within targets.
Response validation
Efficacy checks
  • Answers match expected yes/no outputs.
  • Response includes required fields and answer structure.
  • Confidence is 0-1 and reasoning strings are non-empty.
  • Response preserves asset ID and storyboard URL.
Efficiency targets
  • Latency: scores are normalized between 0 and 1. Under 8s earns 1.0; past 12s trends toward 0.
  • Token usage: scores are normalized between 0 and 1. Under 2,900 tokens earns 1.0; higher usage reduces the score.
  • Usage data must include total tokens for cost analysis.
Expense guardrails
  • Estimated cost under $0.012 per request for full score.

Provider breakdown

Run 91c5674
Efficacy scoreHigher is better
LatencyLower is better
Token UsageLower is better
CostLower is better
ProviderModelCasesAvg ScoreAvg LatencyAvg TokensAvg CostAvg Cost / Min
anthropicclaude-sonnet-4-510.96s4,449$0.0151$0.0263/min
googlegemini-2.5-flash114.18s2,981$0.0019$0.0033/min
googlegemini-3-flash-preview10.974.5s3,700$0.0019$0.0034/min
googlegemini-3.1-flash-lite10.972.52s3,492$0.0011$0.0019/min
openaigpt-5-mini10.8810.1s4,842$0.0025$0.0043/min
openaigpt-5.110.998.02s3,014$0.0019$0.0032/min

Recent cases

Latest 6
anthropic ·claude-sonnet-4-5Jul 6, 07:18 PM
Asset 88Lb01q
Score
0.9
Latency
6s
Cost
$0.0151
google ·gemini-2.5-flashJul 6, 07:18 PM
Asset 88Lb01q
Score
1
Latency
4.18s
Cost
$0.0019
google ·gemini-3-flash-previewJul 6, 07:18 PM
Asset 88Lb01q
Score
0.97
Latency
4.5s
Cost
$0.0019
google ·gemini-3.1-flash-liteJul 6, 07:18 PM
Asset 88Lb01q
Score
0.97
Latency
2.52s
Cost
$0.0011
openai ·gpt-5-miniJul 6, 07:18 PM
Asset 88Lb01q
Score
0.88
Latency
10.1s
Cost
$0.0025
openai ·gpt-5.1Jul 6, 07:18 PM
Asset 88Lb01q
Score
0.99
Latency
8.02s
Cost
$0.0019