Workflow Eval Detail

Ask Questions

Answers natural-language questions about a video by retrieving relevant context and answering with a concise response.

Latest Runcompleted
muxinc/ai
maind8d0122·@mux/ai v0.53.0
Cases
7
Avg Score
0.94
Avg Latency
4.14s
Avg Cost
$0.0041
Avg Cost / Min
$0.0071/min
Avg Tokens
4,048
TL;DR

Google delivered the strongest overall quality and fastest provider average, while GPT-5.6 Luna offered the lowest model cost; validate these findings with more runs.

Best Quality
google
gemini-2.5-flash
Fastest
google
gemini-3.1-flash-lite
Most Economical
openai
gpt-5.6-luna

What we measure

Each eval run captures efficacy, efficiency, and expense. We use this data to compare providers and track regressions over time.

Efficacy
Quality + correctness
Efficiency
Latency + token usage
Expense
Cost per request

Workflow snapshot

Suite statussuccess
Suite average score0.94
Suite duration28.98s
Last suite runOct 16, 09:37 PM

Evaluation criteria

From eval tests

We score answer accuracy and response integrity while tracking latency, token usage, and cost.

Question set3 checks
Question
Has on-screen text?
Answer: YesConf0.94
Question
Is the speaker visible?
Answer: NoConf0.88
Question
Scene indoors?
Answer: YesConf0.91
Accuracy
Match expected yes/no outputs.
Format
Required fields + response shape.
Integrity
Confidence and reasoning present.
Throughput
Latency and cost stay within targets.
Response validation
Efficacy checks
  • Answers match expected yes/no outputs.
  • Response includes required fields and answer structure.
  • Confidence is 0-1 and reasoning strings are non-empty.
  • Response preserves asset ID and storyboard URL.
Efficiency targets
  • Latency: scores are normalized between 0 and 1. Under 8s earns 1.0; past 12s trends toward 0.
  • Token usage: scores are normalized between 0 and 1. Under 2,900 tokens earns 1.0; higher usage reduces the score.
  • Usage data must include total tokens for cost analysis.
Expense guardrails
  • Estimated cost under $0.012 per request for full score.

Provider breakdown

Run d8d0122
Efficacy scoreHigher is better
LatencyLower is better
Token UsageLower is better
CostLower is better
ProviderModelCasesAvg ScoreAvg LatencyAvg TokensAvg CostAvg Cost / Min
anthropicclaude-sonnet-4-510.886.56s4,739$0.0159$0.0277/min
googlegemini-2.5-flash10.993.7s3,127$0.0017$0.0029/min
googlegemini-3-flash-preview10.954.2s3,978$0.0029$0.005/min
googlegemini-3.1-flash-lite10.962.55s3,766$0.0011$0.002/min
openaigpt-5-mini10.915.37s4,905$0.0012$0.0021/min
openaigpt-5.110.983.4s3,277$0.0054$0.0093/min
openaigpt-5.6-luna10.933.19s4,541$0.0003$0.0005/min

Recent cases

Latest run · 7 cases
anthropic ·claude-sonnet-4-5Oct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 88Lb01q
Score
0.88
Latency
6.56s
Cost
$0.0159
google ·gemini-2.5-flashOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 88Lb01q
Score
0.99
Latency
3.7s
Cost
$0.0017
google ·gemini-3-flash-previewOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 88Lb01q
Score
0.95
Latency
4.2s
Cost
$0.0029
google ·gemini-3.1-flash-liteOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 88Lb01q
Score
0.96
Latency
2.55s
Cost
$0.0011
openai ·gpt-5-miniOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 88Lb01q
Score
0.91
Latency
5.37s
Cost
$0.0012
openai ·gpt-5.1Oct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 88Lb01q
Score
0.98
Latency
3.4s
Cost
$0.0054
openai ·gpt-5.6-lunaOct 16, 09:38 PM
Asset 88Lb01q
Score
0.93
Latency
3.19s
Cost
$0.0003